Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?
Identifieur interne : 000372 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000371; suivant : 000373Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?
Auteurs : Jennifer A. Pereira [Canada] ; Susan Quach ; Huy Hao Dao ; Jeffrey C. Kwong ; Shelley L. Deeks ; Natasha S. Crowcroft ; Sherman D. Quan ; Maryse GuaySource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- épidémiologie : Québec, Rougeole.
- Flambées de maladies, Humains, Internet.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic , epidemiology : Quebec.
- epidemiology : Measles.
- Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Internet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Although interruption of endemic measles was achieved in the Americas in 2002, Quebec experienced an outbreak in 2011 of 776 reported cases; 80% of these individuals had not been fully vaccinated. We analyzed readers' online responses to Canadian news articles regarding the outbreak to better understand public perceptions of measles and vaccination.
METHODS
We searched Canadian online English and French news sites for articles posted between April 2011 and March 2012 containing the words "measles" and "Quebec". We included articles that i) concerned the outbreak or related vaccination strategies; and ii) generated at least ten comments. Two English and two bilingual researchers coded the unedited comments, categorizing codes to allow themes to emerge.
RESULTS
We analyzed 448 comments from 188 individuals, in response to three French articles and six English articles; 112 individuals expressed positive perceptions of measles vaccination (2.2 comments/person), 38 were negative (4.2 comments/person), 11 had mixed feelings (1.5 comments/person), and 27 expressed no opinion (1.1 comments/person). Vaccine-supportive themes involved the success of vaccination in preventing disease spread, societal responsibility to vaccinate for herd immunity, and refutation of the autism link. Those against measles vaccination felt it was a personal rather than societal choice, and conveyed a distrust of vaccine manufacturers, believing that measles infection is not only safe but safer than vaccination. Commenters with mixed feelings expressed uncertainty of the infection's severity, and varied in support of all vaccines based on perceived risk/benefit ratios.
CONCLUSION
The anti-vaccine minority's volume of comments translates to a disproportionately high representation on online boards. Public health messages should address concerns by emphasizing that immunization is always a personal choice in Canada, and that the pharmaceutical industry is strictly controlled. Illustrating the dangers of measles through personal stories, rather than scientific data only, may also serve to strengthen messaging.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064072
PubMed: 23691152
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?</title><author><name sortKey="Pereira, Jennifer A" sort="Pereira, Jennifer A" uniqKey="Pereira J" first="Jennifer A" last="Pereira">Jennifer A. Pereira</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada. jennifer.pereira@oahpp.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Public Health Ontario, Toronto</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Toronto</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quach, Susan" sort="Quach, Susan" uniqKey="Quach S" first="Susan" last="Quach">Susan Quach</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dao, Huy Hao" sort="Dao, Huy Hao" uniqKey="Dao H" first="Huy Hao" last="Dao">Huy Hao Dao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kwong, Jeffrey C" sort="Kwong, Jeffrey C" uniqKey="Kwong J" first="Jeffrey C" last="Kwong">Jeffrey C. Kwong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deeks, Shelley L" sort="Deeks, Shelley L" uniqKey="Deeks S" first="Shelley L" last="Deeks">Shelley L. Deeks</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crowcroft, Natasha S" sort="Crowcroft, Natasha S" uniqKey="Crowcroft N" first="Natasha S" last="Crowcroft">Natasha S. Crowcroft</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quan, Sherman D" sort="Quan, Sherman D" uniqKey="Quan S" first="Sherman D" last="Quan">Sherman D. Quan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guay, Maryse" sort="Guay, Maryse" uniqKey="Guay M" first="Maryse" last="Guay">Maryse Guay</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23691152</idno><idno type="pmid">23691152</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0064072</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000358</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000358</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000358</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000358</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000358</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?</title><author><name sortKey="Pereira, Jennifer A" sort="Pereira, Jennifer A" uniqKey="Pereira J" first="Jennifer A" last="Pereira">Jennifer A. Pereira</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada. jennifer.pereira@oahpp.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Public Health Ontario, Toronto</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Toronto</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quach, Susan" sort="Quach, Susan" uniqKey="Quach S" first="Susan" last="Quach">Susan Quach</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dao, Huy Hao" sort="Dao, Huy Hao" uniqKey="Dao H" first="Huy Hao" last="Dao">Huy Hao Dao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kwong, Jeffrey C" sort="Kwong, Jeffrey C" uniqKey="Kwong J" first="Jeffrey C" last="Kwong">Jeffrey C. Kwong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deeks, Shelley L" sort="Deeks, Shelley L" uniqKey="Deeks S" first="Shelley L" last="Deeks">Shelley L. Deeks</name></author><author><name sortKey="Crowcroft, Natasha S" sort="Crowcroft, Natasha S" uniqKey="Crowcroft N" first="Natasha S" last="Crowcroft">Natasha S. Crowcroft</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quan, Sherman D" sort="Quan, Sherman D" uniqKey="Quan S" first="Sherman D" last="Quan">Sherman D. Quan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guay, Maryse" sort="Guay, Maryse" uniqKey="Guay M" first="Maryse" last="Guay">Maryse Guay</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Disease Outbreaks</term><term>Humans</term><term>Internet</term><term>Measles (epidemiology)</term><term>Quebec (epidemiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Flambées de maladies</term><term>Humains</term><term>Internet</term><term>Québec (épidémiologie)</term><term>Rougeole (épidémiologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Quebec</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Measles</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Québec</term><term>Rougeole</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Disease Outbreaks</term><term>Humans</term><term>Internet</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Flambées de maladies</term><term>Humains</term><term>Internet</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Although interruption of endemic measles was achieved in the Americas in 2002, Quebec experienced an outbreak in 2011 of 776 reported cases; 80% of these individuals had not been fully vaccinated. We analyzed readers' online responses to Canadian news articles regarding the outbreak to better understand public perceptions of measles and vaccination.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>We searched Canadian online English and French news sites for articles posted between April 2011 and March 2012 containing the words "measles" and "Quebec". We included articles that i) concerned the outbreak or related vaccination strategies; and ii) generated at least ten comments. Two English and two bilingual researchers coded the unedited comments, categorizing codes to allow themes to emerge.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>We analyzed 448 comments from 188 individuals, in response to three French articles and six English articles; 112 individuals expressed positive perceptions of measles vaccination (2.2 comments/person), 38 were negative (4.2 comments/person), 11 had mixed feelings (1.5 comments/person), and 27 expressed no opinion (1.1 comments/person). Vaccine-supportive themes involved the success of vaccination in preventing disease spread, societal responsibility to vaccinate for herd immunity, and refutation of the autism link. Those against measles vaccination felt it was a personal rather than societal choice, and conveyed a distrust of vaccine manufacturers, believing that measles infection is not only safe but safer than vaccination. Commenters with mixed feelings expressed uncertainty of the infection's severity, and varied in support of all vaccines based on perceived risk/benefit ratios.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>The anti-vaccine minority's volume of comments translates to a disproportionately high representation on online boards. Public health messages should address concerns by emphasizing that immunization is always a personal choice in Canada, and that the pharmaceutical industry is strictly controlled. Illustrating the dangers of measles through personal stories, rather than scientific data only, may also serve to strengthen messaging.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23691152</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>8</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e64072</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0064072</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Although interruption of endemic measles was achieved in the Americas in 2002, Quebec experienced an outbreak in 2011 of 776 reported cases; 80% of these individuals had not been fully vaccinated. We analyzed readers' online responses to Canadian news articles regarding the outbreak to better understand public perceptions of measles and vaccination.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">We searched Canadian online English and French news sites for articles posted between April 2011 and March 2012 containing the words "measles" and "Quebec". We included articles that i) concerned the outbreak or related vaccination strategies; and ii) generated at least ten comments. Two English and two bilingual researchers coded the unedited comments, categorizing codes to allow themes to emerge.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">We analyzed 448 comments from 188 individuals, in response to three French articles and six English articles; 112 individuals expressed positive perceptions of measles vaccination (2.2 comments/person), 38 were negative (4.2 comments/person), 11 had mixed feelings (1.5 comments/person), and 27 expressed no opinion (1.1 comments/person). Vaccine-supportive themes involved the success of vaccination in preventing disease spread, societal responsibility to vaccinate for herd immunity, and refutation of the autism link. Those against measles vaccination felt it was a personal rather than societal choice, and conveyed a distrust of vaccine manufacturers, believing that measles infection is not only safe but safer than vaccination. Commenters with mixed feelings expressed uncertainty of the infection's severity, and varied in support of all vaccines based on perceived risk/benefit ratios.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The anti-vaccine minority's volume of comments translates to a disproportionately high representation on online boards. Public health messages should address concerns by emphasizing that immunization is always a personal choice in Canada, and that the pharmaceutical industry is strictly controlled. Illustrating the dangers of measles through personal stories, rather than scientific data only, may also serve to strengthen messaging.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pereira</LastName><ForeName>Jennifer A</ForeName><Initials>JA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada. jennifer.pereira@oahpp.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quach</LastName><ForeName>Susan</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dao</LastName><ForeName>Huy Hao</ForeName><Initials>HH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kwong</LastName><ForeName>Jeffrey C</ForeName><Initials>JC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Deeks</LastName><ForeName>Shelley L</ForeName><Initials>SL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Crowcroft</LastName><ForeName>Natasha S</ForeName><Initials>NS</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quan</LastName><ForeName>Sherman D</ForeName><Initials>SD</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guay</LastName><ForeName>Maryse</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><CollectiveName>Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Program Delivery, Evaluation Group</CollectiveName></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004196" MajorTopicYN="Y">Disease Outbreaks</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020407" MajorTopicYN="Y">Internet</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008457" MajorTopicYN="N">Measles</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="Y">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011792" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Quebec</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><InvestigatorList><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bettinger</LastName><ForeName>Julie</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Boulianne</LastName><ForeName>Nicole</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brien</LastName><ForeName>Stephanie</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buckeridge</LastName><ForeName>David</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chambers</LastName><ForeName>Larry</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Crowcroft</LastName><ForeName>Natasha</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Crowe</LastName><ForeName>Lois</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Deeks</LastName><ForeName>Shelley</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Finkelstein</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guay</LastName><ForeName>Maryse</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hamid</LastName><ForeName>Jemila</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kolbe</LastName><ForeName>Faron</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kwong</LastName><ForeName>Jeff</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>McGeer</LastName><ForeName>Allison</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pereira</LastName><ForeName>Jennifer</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quach</LastName><ForeName>Susan</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quan</LastName><ForeName>Sherman</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sander</LastName><ForeName>Beate</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sider</LastName><ForeName>Doug</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sikora</LastName><ForeName>Chris</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Investigator><Investigator ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Winter</LastName><ForeName>Anne-Luise</ForeName><Initials>AL</Initials></Investigator></InvestigatorList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23691152</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0064072</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-13-03517</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3654905</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2005 Apr 27;23(23):3010-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15811647</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2007 Dec 5;298(21):2482-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18056901</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2010 Feb 10;28(6):1535-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20003922</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1709-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20045099</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002199</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22022249</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18479</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21533161</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19467</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21573238</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;204 Suppl 1:S270-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21666172</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:99</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20403201</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Crowcroft, Natasha S" sort="Crowcroft, Natasha S" uniqKey="Crowcroft N" first="Natasha S" last="Crowcroft">Natasha S. Crowcroft</name><name sortKey="Dao, Huy Hao" sort="Dao, Huy Hao" uniqKey="Dao H" first="Huy Hao" last="Dao">Huy Hao Dao</name><name sortKey="Deeks, Shelley L" sort="Deeks, Shelley L" uniqKey="Deeks S" first="Shelley L" last="Deeks">Shelley L. Deeks</name><name sortKey="Guay, Maryse" sort="Guay, Maryse" uniqKey="Guay M" first="Maryse" last="Guay">Maryse Guay</name><name sortKey="Kwong, Jeffrey C" sort="Kwong, Jeffrey C" uniqKey="Kwong J" first="Jeffrey C" last="Kwong">Jeffrey C. Kwong</name><name sortKey="Quach, Susan" sort="Quach, Susan" uniqKey="Quach S" first="Susan" last="Quach">Susan Quach</name><name sortKey="Quan, Sherman D" sort="Quan, Sherman D" uniqKey="Quan S" first="Sherman D" last="Quan">Sherman D. Quan</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Pereira, Jennifer A" sort="Pereira, Jennifer A" uniqKey="Pereira J" first="Jennifer A" last="Pereira">Jennifer A. Pereira</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000372 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000372 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeCanadaV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23691152
|texte= Contagious comments: what was the online buzz about the 2011 Quebec measles outbreak?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23691152" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |